Assessment of RELAP5/MOD 2 against Marviken jet impingement test 11 level swell

  • 42 Pages
  • 4.57 MB
  • 8022 Downloads
  • English
by
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, Available from Supt. of Docs., U.S. G.P.O., National Technical Information Service , Washington, D.C, Springfield, VA
Nuclear pressure vessels, Light water reactors -- Data processing, Nuclear power plants -- Thermodynamics, Nuclear reactor kin
Other titlesStudsvik Energiteknik AB
Statementprepared by Ö. Rosdahl, D. Caraher ; prepared as part of the Agreement on Research Participation and Technical Exchange under the International Thermal-Hydraulic Code Assessment and Application Program (ICAP)
SeriesInternational agreement report -- NUREG/IA-0006
ContributionsCaraher, D., U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research
The Physical Object
Paginationv, 42 p. :
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL14948304M

Assessment of RELAP5/MOD 2 Against Marviken Jet Impingement Test 11 Level Swell (NUREG/IA) On this page: Publication Information; Abstract; Download complete document. NUREG/IA (PDF MB) Publication Information.

Date Published: September Prepared by: 0. Rosdahl, D. Caraher. Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate P.O. Box Get this from a library. Assessment of RELAP5/MOD 2 against Marviken jet impingement test 11 level swell. [Ö Rosdahl; D Caraher; U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory. Assessment of RELAP5/MOD 2 Against Marviken Jet Impingement Test 11 Level Swell Prepared by 0. Rosdahl, D. Caraher Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate P.O. Box S #52 Stockholm, Sweden Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S.

Download Assessment of RELAP5/MOD 2 against Marviken jet impingement test 11 level swell FB2

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. September Prepared as part of. Get this from a library. Assessment of RELAP5/MOD 2 against critical flow data from Marviken tests JIT 11 and CFT [Ö Rosdahl; D Caraher; U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Division of. Assessment of RELAP5/MOD2 critical flow model using Marviken test data 15 and 24 [microform] / prepared by K. Kim, H.-J. Kim Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Available from Supt.

of Docs., U.S. G.P.O. ; National Technical Information Service [distributor Washington, DC: Springfield, VA The changes in parameters include variations in the jet Reynolds number from 2 × to 8 ×impingement height, distance between the centerlines of the two jets from D to 16D where D is.

Int. Symp. on Heat Transfer in Gas Turbine Systems 9*14 AugustAntalya, Turkey REFERENCES [1] Han, B. and Goldstein, R. [], Jet-impingement heat transfer in gas turbine systems. The inline jet arrays had diameters of 54μm and μm, a spacing of μm, a standoff of μm (S/d= andH/d= and ), and jet-to-heater area ratios from to 9 Defense AT&L: September-October DiPetto is the deputy director for developmental test and evaluation in the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics.

Details Assessment of RELAP5/MOD 2 against Marviken jet impingement test 11 level swell EPUB

He has more than 28 years of experience in DoD and is Level III certified in T&E. He is a graduate of the U.S. Navy Test Pilot School and the. TIP #2: Make sure to measure the modal frequency.

Measure the peak velocity of the TR jet, only if the modal frequency is clearly demonstrated. Modal Frequency: frequency at which most of the red blood cells are moving; Considerations for TR Jet Envelope. Technical and patient factors have a strong bearing on accurate estimation of RVSP.

Implementation of the HRIC model in modeling jet impingement of a non heated substrate. Modeling impinging jet using Volume of Fluid and Level set method Impinging jet of water.

Description Assessment of RELAP5/MOD 2 against Marviken jet impingement test 11 level swell FB2

Jet impingement produces a rapid cooling or heating on the surface where it impinges. Study on the effect of pulsating frequencies on the impingement heat transfer has been focused by many researchers in the past.

Pulsating flow is widely believed to [11].The results from present experiments and. FIGURE 6. Neer impingement test. Passive, forceful flexion of the shoulder causes a "jamming" of the greater tuberosity against the inferior acromion. The test is repeated following an injection of 10 ml of 1 % Lidocaine.

The absence of the "impingement sign" confirms the impingement syndrome. FIGURE 7. Hawkins-Kennedy impingement test. Assessment of RELAP5/MOD2 Against Marviken Jet Impingement Test 11 Level Swell: NUREG/IA Assessment of RELAP5/MOD2 Against Critical Flow Data From Marviken Tests JIT 11 and CFT NUREG/IA Assessment Study of RELAP-5 MOD-2 Cycle Based on the DOEL-2 Steam Generator Tube Rupture Incident of June NUREG/IA Figure Corner Reflection Analysis Model 11 Figure Blast Wave Contour for Case of Reflection at Corner in Static Pressure 12 Figure Relation between r/d and Peak Pressure 13 Figure Relation between r/d and Reflection Amplification Factor 13 Figure 2.

In the test cases selected, the jet discharge was two and six diameters above a plane surface orthogonal to the jet's axis. Impinging jet studies for turbulent model assessment rp - 00 0.J 02 O-J 04 r/D - I r/D I ool 02 YP L a4 o-2 YP 0.S 1 04 FIG.

[15]. Figure II considers. is sufficiently far from the impingement surface to behave as a free submerged jet. Here, the velocity gradients in the jet create a shearing at the edges of the jet which transfers momentum laterally outward, pulling additional fluid along with the jet and raising the jet mass flow, as shown in Fig.

In the. A stainless steel (SS) vertical rod of 12 mm diameter at ± 10 °C initial temperature was cooled by normal impinging round water jet.

The surface rewetting phenomenon was investigated for a range of jet diameter – mm and jet Reynolds number –24, using a straight tube type nozzle.

The investigation were made from the stagnation point to maximum 40 mm downstream. Marviken Jet Impingement Test (JIT) 11 (saturated steam flow) and Marviken Critical Flow Test (CFT) 21 (subcooled and two-phase flow).

The experimental facility consisted of a large vessel m in diameter and 22 m high having a total volume of mi3. A discharge pipe contain. Supine Impingement Test. This test is used to screen for shoulder impingement “Patient is in a supine position with examiner at the side of the involved arm.

Examiner grasps the patient’s wrist and distal aspect of the humerus and elevates the patient’s arm to end range.

Examiner moves the patient’s arm into external rotation and. Welcome to the Plastic Processing Assessment. Upon completion, this test is designed to identify plastic injection skill level.

Skill range is from material handler to process engineer. This question quiz is available in printable form including the test keys for. Analysis of the jet impingement test data was performed using the K-FIX computer code and good agreement was obtained as shown in fig.

Download: Download full-size image; Fig. Comparison of measured and calculated impingement plate pressure versus radial position at 10 s in Marviken test 10 (subcooled water).

Flow Structure. The computed streamline contours using the k–ω model are plotted in Fig. Fig correspond to surface-to-jet velocities ratios of 0 ≤ R sj ≤ 4 for Re = 10, and H/e = 8. There is a good agreement between numerical predictions and experimental data of Senter [] for 0 ≤ R sj ≤ Several types of flow structure were observed depending on the surface-to.

few examples of jet impingement cooling. A flow field is characterized by a jet zone, a stagnation zone and a wall jet zone, as indicated in Figure 1.

D Figure 1. Flow field characteristics. Numerical Setup In this section, an overview on the numerical setup investigations is presented. The numerical grid density is taken into consideration.

For a confined impingement system, the end of the stagnation region has the minimum value, which is negative, whereas along the wall jet region the static pressure increases slightly with the downstream distance Appl. Math.

Modelling,October Slot jet impingement using k - s turbulence models: S. Seyedein et al. 0,8 N a. Comparison of the Nu and η distributions obtained from present air jet impingement technique with that of the two-equation technique.

Developing correlations for Nu and η in terms of flame jet parameters. Thermal efficiency determination and its variation with flame jet parameters. Experimental details   The distance between the nozzle exit plane and the test surface was varied from 10 to 80 cm. Measurements of static and total pressure were made by the help of pressure taps made on the test surfaces and a pitot tube.

The numerical simulations were performed by the solution of Reynolds—Averaged Navier-Stokes equations with a v ′ 2-f model. Jet impingement method Recirculating loop Centrifugal accelerator Whirling arm rig.

Jan 2 CAVITATION EROSION TEST SYSTEM Schematic diagram of vibratory apparatus for cavitation erosion Cavitation liquid jet ASTM G Cavitation erosion using vibratory apparatus ASTM G concluded that jet impingement onto dimples performed best with the maximum crossflow scheme and larger jet-to-plate spacing due to the coupled effect of impingement and channel flow.

Xing [2] performed an experiment on nine-by-nine jet array impinging on a flat and dimpled plate at Reynolds numbers f to 35, An experimental jet impingement facility was constructed with the capability of conducting a detailed analysis of the local heat transfer coefficients beneath an array of large impinging jets.

The facility was validated with initial heat transfer studies that determined an appropriate jet discharge coefficient of and created a correlation. liquid jet-impingement array, but with an increase in the pumping power. A second prototype was designed, fabricated, [2, 3, 4, 11, 23].

Moreover, studies have demonstrated that jet impingement We also test the inverter inverter at full power conditions using a dynamometer with.Assessment of RELAP5/MOD 2 against critical flow data from Marviken tests JIT 11 and CFT 21 / (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ), by Ö.

Rosdahl, D. Caraher, and U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (page images at HathiTrust) Selected materials on the Calvert Cliffs decision, its origin and aftermath. An impinging jet test rig (IJTR) was designed and constructed to study the mechanism of erosion-corrosion in high temperature caustic solutions and was used in a systematic program of experiments at the Bayer plant site.

(mm year-') Tl 90 3 10 70 1 T 90 3 30 70 1 Tl 90 3 10 70 5 T 90 3 30 70 5